Remote Viewer:I have just finished reading How To Read The Akashic Records by Linda Howe and I want to do this. For myself as well as for others. So I would like you all to help me manifest this gift.
I also need practice and would like to practice on any here that will let me.
Here's how it goes:
You would email me (off list) and tell me a particular problem or difficulty you're having in your life. I would then go to the Akashic Records, open your Book and have the Record keepers, Masters and Loved Ones tell me what to tell you. I am not to hold anything back, no matter how small a detail it might seem to me. I will email you back whatever info I 'get' if I get any.

Me: My name is Joni M. Miner.

The question is, am I on the right path into the Catholic Church? What am I to do there? JMM

R.V.: Hi Joni, I asked and I saw a dog. I then saw a long hallway and was told :
" The future will reveal itself when it is needed." Maybe the dog is a clue.


With this information I began to follow the clues: This is were it lead me? See for your self, but first let me tell you a bit about me and dogs! I love dogs! They are great teachers and companions they teach unconditional love! They help us in many areas of our lives! I have had many dogs, but my Shoulder was who this viewing reminded me of. She was a Bloodhound, She was a good tracker. I relate to her at this time as I am on an information hunt and I am a pretty good tracker myself, with the help on my guide, Jesus! The world treated Jesus like a dog! I have felt treated like a dog, abused, kicked around and abandoned! My life has been comparatively a dog's life! Taking the scrapes handed out from the masters that control every thing! Masters of Abusive Power!(Go lay down or I will kick you out in the cold!) The power of control will need to be broken to set our people free!

My trusty Dog and I are about to go on the hunt for the trouble makers of this town! From the begging of my life here I have found to many who look down at me as if they are better then me! These were people with positions of power and control over my well being in life. This cast me into mistrust of others by their actions. The jobs I had taught me many things beside a trade. I was always good at what I did, but I could never just go to work and do my job. There was always someone playing games. Others would come to me for help with people or employers after seeing me deal with them on my issues. The world is full of employers, officials, teachers, health professionals, and even clergy who have used there position of power for unethical control of the people who they are entrusted! When it comes to making money, power is the harvester that sweeps and thrashes the plants to shake every piece of value out of that plant before tilling it under! The abuse of power used to run over the little guy. To take every opportunity to find a way to shake more money out of them. Greed is truly the sin of the world! Greed of power and money!

God is going to do some harvesting of his own soon, there is going to be some shaking and thrashing and whaling of voices when things get turned upside down and what is right will become left and you there on the top or so you think, will be put just as low or lower then you keep our people! The lord will even the playing field! A great power will be felt through out the earth when the hand of God take hold the earth with His mighty force! From the begging to the end all things move and when they move all things will change! Creation continues always and God's creation will be his own, the power of man has run it's coarse, the Power of God will always win!

The Tracks Of Remote Viewing:

TheTransition/021.htmLens to all the planets! The hallway! The lens to me on this planet coming through Jesus! The dog of the world the up setter of unjust deeds! The window appearing in my mind sees the dog at the entrance of the door leading into the hallway of the lens reaching back to were I came from! Until the time of coming home he him self has once again taken on the form of a dog in order to guide me and let me lean upon Him; as I walk though this valley of darkness seeking His light! Letting His light shine through me and unto any darkness with hopes to lead some back into the hallway or lens back to Him! In love I do this in His Name as I call Him! Jesus!

A Journey Animal Guide appears at the fork in the road of your life. When a decision is made to follow a certain path in life, the Journey Guide is there to serve as a guide along the way. It represents a path that may take months or years to complete. It can be a friendly traveling companion if the path is right. If you become lost along the way, the Journey Guide is there help lead the way back. Unlike a Messenger Guide who comes and leaves quickly, the Journey Guide remains at your side until the current cycle in your life has changed. appears at the fork in the road of your life. When a decision is made to follow a certain path in life, the Journey Guide is there to serve as a guide along the way. It represents a path that may take months or years to complete. It can be a friendly traveling companion if the path is right. If you become lost along the way, the Journey Guide is there help lead the way back. Unlike a Messenger Guide who comes and leaves quickly, the Journey Guide remains at your side until the current cycle in your life has changed.

The tracks this week lead me to find this den of deceit when my trusty canine ears over heard plans abusive power.

"The psychology of power, Absolutely Power corrupts,Power corrupts, but it corrupts only those who think they deserve it..."

In My Opinion

What I heard this week, came to my ears, as I sat in the most common area of my housing complex. What I heard, I feel, was an out right example of the abuse of power! Just the fact that they reprimanded me just for asking a question to another resident after hearing what lead me to believe, she just might possibly be working for the owners to spy on the residents here and report back to them so as to accomplish their goal of collecting evidence in order to evict residents 'they' deem unfit to live here. Their opinion! Yet we are not allowed an opinion and are reprimanded like little children if we speak our minds! If we do, we are either a "trouble maker" as was described to me by said manager about two other tenets, when I fist moved in here, which I called to her attention on one other occasions, pointing out to her the error of her comments. This brought on my miss trust in her! Or we are targeted by them to be harassed and driven from our homes. I felt fear of her even then when she first said those things to me, that is what put me on edge right from the start. Instilling fear into some one is the oldest form of control and the oldest form of abuse! If one is not educated on the psychology of the way behavioral thinking works then how can one manage people. They can not, they too become the controlled! Controlled by the one at top pulling the strings. They become the fall guy if need be, and they do not even know it! This is to save money in hiring professionals but in the end they only hurt the innocent to put more money in there pockets. The wrong people in the wrong positions! I have seen this happen time and time again! These organizations use the government to make there money and do not care who they hurt on there way up that ladder! Where that ladder goes will not be heaven in my opinion! Jesus would not do this to His people! Especially the elderly and handicapped, like this here at Elkhorn Village!

The fact that I could hear every thing they were saying was I believe a gift from God to my ears in order to shine the light on the dark around here!
However there is also the fact that if I could hear all of that, how much is being said in that office that is being heard by other residents, leading to rumors and keeping things stirred up around here! That could be the root of all the gossip I hear about me not living here, maybe it is because they hear the manager in there talking about it to who knows who, but you get my idea, I hope! I have kept a low profile around here while I am healing, to much stimulation gets me flared up even if it is positive stimulation, let alone negative! Yet the undertone around here keeps many in a state of fear to live life with out feeling the need to protect ones self in ones own home! JMM

I pray that we receive the right education on our options as we try to seek answer to this most invasive and demeaning problem of, Abuse Of Power!
May my power always be from God, may my words be His words, may my wisdom be His wisdom! May His strength up hold the innocent and weak and protect them with His care! Amen

Following is educative information for those who want to know the truth:

"The psychology of power
Absolutely
Power corrupts, but it corrupts only those who think they deserve it"

Jan 21st 2010

"REPORTS of politicians who have extramarital affairs while complaining about the death of family values, or who use public funding for private gain despite condemning government waste, have become so common in recent years that they hardly seem surprising anymore. Anecdotally, at least, the connection between power and hypocrisy looks obvious.

Anecdote is not science, though. And, more subtly, even if anecdote is correct, it does not answer the question of whether power tends to corrupt, as Lord Acton’s dictum has it, or whether it merely attracts the corruptible. To investigate this question Joris Lammers at Tilburg University, in the Netherlands, and Adam Galinsky at Northwestern University, in Illinois, have conducted a series of experiments which attempted to elicit states of powerfulness and powerlessness in the minds of volunteers. Having done so, as they report in Psychological Science, they tested those volunteers’ moral pliability. Lord Acton, they found, was right.

In their first study, Dr Lammers and Dr Galinsky asked 61 university students to write about a moment in their past when they were in a position of high or low power. Previous research has established that this is an effective way to “prime” people into feeling as if they are currently in such a position. Each group (high power and low power) was then split into two further groups. Half were asked to rate, on a nine-point morality scale (with one being highly immoral and nine being highly moral), how objectionable it would be for other people to over-report travel expenses at work. The other half were asked to participate in a game of dice.

The dice players were told to roll two ten-sided dice (one for “tens” and one for “units”) in the privacy of an isolated cubicle, and report the results to a lab assistant. The number they rolled, which would be a value between one and 100 (two zeros), would determine the number of tickets that they would be given in a small lottery that was run at the end of the study.

In the case of the travel expenses—when the question hung on the behavior of others—participants in the high-power group reckoned, on average, that over-reporting rated as a 5.8 on the nine-point scale. Low-power participants rated it 7.2. The powerful, in other words, claimed to favor the moral course. In the dice game, however, high-power participants reported, on average, that they had rolled 70 while low-power individuals reported an average 59. Though the low-power people were probably cheating a bit (the expected average score would be 50), the high-power volunteers were undoubtedly cheating—perhaps taking the term “high roller” rather too literally.

Taken together, these results do indeed suggest that power tends to corrupt and to promote a hypocritical tendency to hold other people to a higher standard than oneself. To test the point further, though, Dr Lammers and Dr Galinsky explicitly contrasted attitudes to self and other people when the morally questionable activity was the same in each case. Having once again primed two groups of participants to be either high-power or low-power, they then asked some members of each group how acceptable it would be for someone else to break the speed limit when late for an appointment and how acceptable it would be for the participant himself to do so. Others were asked similar questions about tax declarations.
Only the little people pay taxes…

In both cases participants used the same one-to-nine scale employed in the first experiment. The results showed that the powerful do, indeed, behave hypocritically. They felt that others speeding because they were late warranted a 6.3 on the scale whereas speeding themselves warranted a 7.6. Low-power individuals, by contrast, saw everyone as equal. They scored themselves as 7.2 and others at 7.3—a statistically insignificant difference. In the case of tax dodging, the results were even more striking. High-power individuals felt that when others broke tax laws this rated as a 6.6 on the morality scale, but that if they did so themselves this rated as a 7.6. In this case low-power individuals were actually easier on others and harsher on themselves, with values of 7.7 and 6.8 respectively.

These results, then, suggest that the powerful do indeed behave hypocritically, condemning the transgressions of others more than they condemn their own. Which comes as no great surprise, although it is always nice to have everyday observation confirmed by systematic analysis. But another everyday observation is that powerful people who have been caught out often show little sign of contrition. It is not just that they abuse the system; they also seem to feel entitled to abuse it. To investigate this point, Dr Lammers and Dr Galinsky devised a third set of experiments. These were designed to disentangle the concept of power from that of entitlement. To do this, the researchers changed the way they primed people.

A culture of entitlement

Half of 105 participants were asked to write about a past experience in which they had legitimately been given a role of high or low power. The others were asked to write about an experience of high or low power where they did not feel their power (or lack of it) was legitimate. All of the volunteers were then asked to rate how immoral it would be for someone to take an abandoned bicycle rather than report the bicycle to the police. They were also asked, if they were in real need of a bicycle, how likely they would be to take it themselves and not report it.

The “powerful” who had been primed to believe they were entitled to their power readily engaged in acts of moral hypocrisy. They assigned a value of 5.1 to others engaging in the theft of the bicycle while rating the action at 6.9 if they were to do it themselves. Among participants in all of the low-power states, morally hypocritical behaviour inverted itself, as it had in the case of tax fraud. “Legitimate” low-power individuals assigned others a score of 5.1 if they stole a bicycle and gave themselves a 4.3. Those primed to feel that their lack of power was illegitimate behaved similarly, assigning values of 4.7 and 4.4 respectively.

However, an intriguing characteristic emerged among participants in high-power states who felt they did not deserve their elevated positions. These people showed a similar tendency to that found in low-power individuals—to be harsh on themselves and less harsh on others—but the effect was considerably more dramatic. They felt that others warranted a lenient 6.0 on the morality scale when stealing a bike but assigned a highly immoral 3.9 if they took it themselves. Dr Lammers and Dr Galinsky call this reversal “hypercrisy”.

They argue, therefore, that people with power that they think is justified break rules not only because they can get away with it, but also because they feel at some intuitive level that they are entitled to take what they want. This sense of entitlement is crucial to understanding why people misbehave in high office. In its absence, abuses will be less likely. The word “privilege” translates as “private law”. If Dr Lammers and Dr Galinsky are right, the sense which some powerful people seem to have that different rules apply to them is not just a convenient smoke screen. They genuinely believe it.

What explains hypocrisy is less obvious. It is known, though, from experiments on other species that if those at the bottom of a dominance hierarchy show signs of getting uppity, those at the top react both quickly and aggressively. Hypocrisy might thus be a signal of submissiveness—one that is exaggerated in creatures that feel themselves to be in the wrong place in the hierarchy. By applying reverse privileges to themselves, they hope to escape punishment from the real dominants. Perhaps the lesson, then, is that corruption and hypocrisy are the price that societies pay for being led by alpha males (and, in some cases, alpha females). The alternative, though cleaner, is leadership by wimps. "
Read
Most scientists believe a change in prevalence of a health risk behavior in a population will manifest itself between ten and thirty years after the change takes place. Since 1964, the War on Tobacco has caused one of the largest changes in health behavior of a population ever known, over a relatively short period of time. It is now past the time when we have a right to expect profound changes in the health profile of Americans due to the War on Tobacco.

This article http://kuneman.smokersclub.com/timetrendsonsmoking.html examines the smoking behavior of various American birth groups, identifies the years when smoking related disease changes should occur based on the age of these birth groups, and concludes no significant health profile changes have occurred that can be credited to the War on Tobacco, except for a 10% drop in lung cancer and a small drop in laryngeal cancer.

Further, it is concluded that no cost savings treating tobacco related disease have been realized. Comparisons are made to the health profiles of Europeans who have had no War on Tobacco prior to the mid 1990s, which confirm our War on Tobacco is worthless. Literature is cited that predict our young generations of Americans can also expect no health bonanza from the War on Tobacco.